![]() ![]() In that case, it may be more complicated since the problem showed up over a longer period of time and there are more parties involved so the developer blames the city (if I remember correctly), the architect blames the ground and defends their use of whatever stabilization system they chose. Not just a little but a lot! Of course, all owners are wealthy. This building reminds me of the one in SF that Joe Montana purchased in. And, have water leaking from the ceiling, get stuck for hours in the elevator, be terrified at night from the howling, swaying building in the wind. For example, if you don't close, we'll just take your deposit and sell it to someone else AND if you do close then you are accepting the unit/building as is. You can be a billionaire and live in the penthouse overlooking Central Park. Abramovichs apartment several floors below the leak, causing an estimated 500,000 in damage, she said. at their disposal yet still chose to move forward.Īlso, sometimes the developers make it very hard on buyers. The Downside to Life in a Supertall Tower: Leaks, Creaks, Breaks After the first incident, water seeped into Ms. These people have the life experience, intelligence, lawyers, advisors. Some owners showed up, knew there was something wrong, and still closed. Print this article Font size -16 + THE nearly 1,400-foot tower at 432 Park. Some may have closed after inspection showed some problems. Leaks, creaks, breaks: The downside to life in a super-tall condo tower. Some owners closed without inspecting the unit/building. I don't know if the remedy should be a refund or just fixing things or what. ![]() ![]() If we took the dollar amount out of the equation, I think it would be obvious to everyone that the builder/architect/. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |